The investigation continued after Julian's departure.
There was no dramatic announcement that solved everything.
There were spreadsheets, bank statements, approval records, and meetings that lasted longer than anyone wanted.
The forensic accountants needed to establish what had been paid, who had authorized it, and whether the company had received the services described in the invoices.
The audit committee wanted documentation.
The directors wanted clear answers.
I wanted both.
Renee brought me an updated report on Monday morning.
The stack of papers was thicker than the previous one.
“Some of the payments have been matched,” she said. “Others still need supporting records.”
I read the summary.
The Vantage Strategies invoices remained a central concern.
The firm had supposedly provided market research and strategic advice.
But the accountants had not found the reports that should have supported the charges.
There were also expenses that appeared excessive or unrelated to ordinary company business.
The kitchen renovation was among them.
I kept returning to that entry.
The description was so ordinary.
A regional sales office improvement.
It sounded harmless until someone compared the supporting records with the actual work performed.
I had approved many legitimate expenses during my years at Ashford Medical.
I knew how easily an invoice could be misunderstood when someone looked at it without context.
That was why I insisted on a proper review.
If a charge had a legitimate explanation, we needed to document it.
If it did not, we needed to know that too.
I wasn't interested in replacing one careless accusation with another.
The committee arranged a meeting to review the findings.
I attended as board chair but made it clear that the independent directors needed to assess the evidence themselves.
I would answer questions about the company's structure and the relevant approvals.
I would not tell them what conclusion to reach.
During the meeting, one director asked whether Julian had personally approved the disputed payments.
The accountants explained which records showed his authorization.
Another asked whether the vendor's relationship to Vivian had been disclosed.
The answer required more review.
The discussion was uncomfortable.
It was also necessary.
For years, I had wanted the board to function as a group of people who challenged one another's assumptions.
Now I had to accept that the same process would examine decisions made during my own leadership.
I had appointed Julian.
I had trusted him.
That did not make me responsible for every action he had taken, but it did mean I had to consider whether I had given him too much freedom without enough oversight.
I left the meeting with a list of questions.
Not accusations.
Questions.
The next few days were spent gathering the answers.
Meanwhile, the company needed a permanent leadership plan.
The chief operating officer continued managing daily operations.
Department heads met to review deadlines and supplier commitments.
The finance team separated disputed transactions from ordinary expenses so that the investigation would not interfere unnecessarily with routine payments.
I wanted the employees to see that the company could function without Julian.
Not because he had contributed nothing.
He had been capable in many areas.
He had helped secure business and had represented the company well in public.
But no executive should be so central that the entire organization becomes helpless when that person leaves.
My father had never built Ashford Medical around one personality.
He had built systems.
I had allowed the company to become too dependent on Julian's image.
That needed to change.
One afternoon, a department manager came to my office.
She carried a folder and looked nervous.
“I wanted to ask whether the overtime decision is going to be reviewed.”
I invited her to sit down.
“The suspension of overtime?”
“Yes. People are worried that it will stay in place.”
I told her the company would review staffing and production needs as part of its operational assessment.
I couldn't promise an immediate change.
The company still had to understand its financial position.
But I promised that decisions would be based on actual business requirements rather than unexplained claims that money was unavailable.
She thanked me.
After she left, I looked at the staffing report.
The workers had been asked to accept reduced earnings while the company was paying for services it could not properly identify.
That fact bothered me more than I expected.
I had spent years negotiating contracts to keep those employees working.
They trusted the company to act fairly.
I couldn't undo the uncertainty they had experienced.
I could make sure their concerns were part of the decisions ahead.
That evening, I received a message from Julian.
It was longer than his courthouse messages.
He wrote that the board had acted unfairly.
He said the investigation had been influenced by personal disagreements.
He accused me of using the divorce to damage his career.
Then he asked me to intervene.
I read the message twice.
He had not asked whether the company was safe.
He had not asked whether the employees were being paid.
He had not offered documents to explain the disputed transactions.
He wanted me to reverse the consequences.
I began typing a reply.
Then I stopped.
I didn't need to argue with him through a phone.
I sent the message to Eleanor and asked whether a response was necessary.
She advised me to keep communication about the corporate matter through the proper channels.
So I did.
A few days later, Julian's attorney contacted the company.
He intended to challenge the termination.
The board's legal advisers prepared to defend the decision using the records and the process already followed.
I knew the challenge would take time.
I also knew that a lawsuit did not prove Julian was right or wrong.
The evidence would have to speak for itself.
I returned to work.
There were contracts to review, suppliers to reassure, and financial reports to examine.
Sometimes I caught myself waiting for Julian to appear in the doorway.
Then I remembered that he no longer worked there.
The habit had not disappeared as quickly as the title on his office door.
His office was eventually cleared according to company procedures.
His personal belongings were collected.
The security team updated access permissions.
Nothing about the process was satisfying.
It was administrative.
Necessary.
Final in the way that a decision becomes final when the work required to carry it out is finished.
One afternoon, I found myself standing outside the boardroom.
The room was empty.
A long table ran beneath the lights.
At the far end sat the chair where Julian used to present his plans.
I remembered how often I had listened while he described the company as his achievement.
I had sometimes wanted to correct him.
I had told myself it wasn't worth creating an argument.
I had believed that people who knew us would understand the truth.
But people outside the company saw the presentations.
They saw the photographs.
They heard Julian speak.
They didn't see the nights I spent reviewing contracts or the years I had spent rebuilding the business after my father's death.
I had allowed my own work to become invisible because I didn't want to appear vain.
That choice had consequences.
It made it easier for Julian to claim credit.
It made it easier for Vivian to dismiss me.
And it made it harder for me to admit how much resentment I had accumulated.
I sat at the head of the table.
For a while, I did nothing.
Then I opened my notebook and wrote down the questions the company needed to answer before appointing a new CEO.
Financial accountability.
Operational stability.
Clear reporting.
Independent oversight.
The next leader would not be chosen because people enjoyed listening to him.
The next leader would have to demonstrate that the company could trust his decisions.
That evening, Renee brought me another update.
The accountants had made progress tracing the payments.
The investigation remained ongoing, and some matters still required formal review.
I read the report and thanked her.
She looked at the papers on my desk.
“You look tired.”
“I am.”
“You could go home.”
I glanced at the clock.
She was right.
I closed the folder.
Before leaving, I put my father's note into the drawer and placed the financial report beside it.
The two pieces of paper belonged together.
One reminded me that access was not ownership.
The other reminded me that ownership was not permission to ignore responsibility.
I turned off the lights.
The company would not recover in a day.
Neither would I.
But we were finally asking the questions that should have been asked much earlier.
Source: kaylestore.net
Click here to continue reading: PART 7: Vivian Still Believed a House Could Be Claimed by Memory Alone, Until the Sixty-Day Notice Forced Her to Face the Difference Between Comfort and Ownership
My Marriage Had Just Ended, Yet My Former Mother-in-Law Was Already Telling Me Where I Was No Longer Allowed to Live
Part 6 of 12
One Comment on “PART 6 – The Company Had to Keep Running While the Auditors Followed the Money, and Every New Record Made My Old Excuses Harder to Believe”